As the presidential race has narrowed
to President Obama versus Mitt Romney (and of course a slew of independent
parties with names of people no one has heard of), the issues that are driving
the race have begun to surface. A little while ago it was the birth control
debate, sparked by comments from radio host Rush Limbaugh, which seemed to help
Obama win favor of voters—especially female voters. The most recent issue is
the economy. When I got the New York Times, the front page had an article on
this exact subject. (The article can be found in its online version here.)
The issue is presented by the paper
as this "The race may be a referendum on Mr. Obama, as Republicans want,
or, as Democrats prefer, a choice between a president nursing the economy back
to health and a challenger who represents the failed politics that caused the
crisis in the first place". What struck me as very interesting in this
sentence was how much of a construction this race is; it points out the two
different ways the problem is framed by saying "as Republicans want"
and "as Democrats prefer". There are always two sides to an issue,
and voters must see be critical when deciding which candidate they trust more,
because each side has a bias and has constructed the debate in a different way.
With all of the current emphasis on
this side of the debate, I am beginning to think about what this says about us
as Americans that we have decided that the economy should be among the most
important topics to consider when voting. In my opinion, the recent focus on
the economy as a driving force in the campaign highlights how materialistic
Americans are. America has remained the number one buyer in the world, and our
obsession with having things and having the money to buy things has been
magnified by the race. We built the United States on a platform of democracy
and freedom, but I think we have in some ways lost sight of these ideals and
turned to material as a way to define our success as a country.
One study asked people what Americans' biggest problems are (an indicator of the issues people will be voting on). |
Do you think that the economy
should be a driving force in the campaigns? What do you think should be one of the most important issues in the campaign?
Na-omes,
ReplyDeleteGood post here. I'm glad to see you are thinking in terms of constructions, and you make some nice ties here and elsewhere in your blog to larger American themes.
Some thoughts to further this post: There are AT LEAST two sides to every issue. Is there a selfish economic desire that makes the economy king? Can you analyze the ways in which the issues and the candidates are framed? Media do not frame equally or with the same degree of bias.
I write those ideas just because I'd like to see you continue blogging. Nice job.